![]() ![]() Proof of intend would "require proof of some communication be it email, text, or oral," he said. "Here is where cooperators come in handy. ![]() Randy Zelin, an attorney who specialized in a wide range of legal disputes, told CNBC in an email that while the authorities may have proof Trump broke these statutes, proving intent could be difficult. "A very dangerous precedent in our democracy." "Unless someone is selling classified information for profit, it would seem quite a stretch to prosecute a former president criminally and get a conviction under these statues - it seems a bit like they are trying to find some sort of crime in his actions as opposed to searching for the perpetrator of a known crime," Elson said in an email. He doesnt seem to read anything thats not pre-digested for him by his staff, so to speak. Trump doesnt read more than a few lines at a time. "Remember that the offenses you cited to me were not on the stone tablets that Moses brought down from the mountain, while the January 6 case looks more like a coup d'etat, treason or sedition - which are ancient and more serious charges."Ĭharles Elson, a veteran attorney who specializes in corporate law, told CNBC in an email he's not convinced that the FBI would be able to prosecute and convict Trump under the statutes listed on the warrant. Answer (1 of 16): No, I dont believe he has read the Constitution, but not because of that threat. "If they do prosecute him, I think it will be for January 6 charges, and these record-keeping offenses are more technical and might look like piling on," Coffee said in an email to CNBC. But, he added, they could have a much stronger case when it comes to the pro-Trump riot on Capitol Hill on Jan. John Coffee, a longtime professor at Columbia Law School, said federal authorities don't need to prosecute Trump if they retrieved everything they were looking for. She was released early from prison in 2021 for good behavior. Winner had leaked intelligence on Russian election interference to The Intercept and pleaded guilty in 2018. Air Force member Reality Winner "went to jail for five years for leaking one document in violation of 18 USC 793," one of the same statutes listed on the warrant to raid Trump's Florida home. Legal experts are mixed about whether the statutes cited by the FBI will lead to Trump's prosecution.īradley Moss, a lawyer specializing in national security and federal employment, noted that former U.S. Most legal and constitutional experts agree: Given the facts that have come to light about former President Donald Trump s role in the mob attack on the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and the efforts. "But the idea that a candidate would have to litigate this is during a campaign is in my view a 'blockbuster in American politics.'" "Yes, I recognize the legal challenge that application of this law to a president would garner (since qualifications are set in Constitution)," Elias tweeted late Monday. January 6 Committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-WY) offered a resolution to issue a subpoena to hear from former President Trump regarding the January 6 attack on the U.S.Willick was responding to Marc Elias, a veteran attorney who has been aligned with the Democratic Party for years. They also shared never-before-seen video of members of Congress seeking safety and asking for help during the attack. Capitol after committee Chair Bennie Thompson (D-MS) said members wanted to hear from the former president because he “is required to answer for his actions.” The committee members recounted prior evidence in lockstep with newly-obtained evidence, such as the Secret Service’s knowledge of a planned attack on the U.S. She said, “We are obligated to seek answers directly from the man who set this all in motion, and every American is entitled to those answers so we can act now to protect our republic.” Her resolution came during the January 6 Committee hearing on the investigation of the attack on the U.S. A look at the executive tactics available to a Trump suggests the potential for mischief. ![]() T15:48:28-04:00 January 6 Committee Vice Chair Liz Cheney (R-WY) offered a resolution to issue a subpoena to hear from former President Trump regarding the January 6 attack on the U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |